EAGLEMANIACAL.com

Eaglemaniacal.com is a Philadelphia Eagles fan site.

  • HOME
  • About
    • CONTACT
  • FORUM
  • GO LONG
    • NFC EAST
      • THE NFC EAST 2025
      • THE NFC EAST 2024
      • THE NFC EAST 2023
      • THE NFC EAST 2022
      • THE NFC EAST 2021
      • THE NFC EAST 2020
      • THE NFC EAST 2019
      • THE NFC EAST 2018
      • THE NFC EAST 2017
    • THE 12
      • 2023 SEASON
      • 2022 SEASON
      • 2021 SEASON
      • 2020 SEASON
      • 2019 SEASON
      • 2018 SEASON
      • 2017 SEASON
  • EAGLES
    • 2025 SCHEDULE
    • 2024 SCHEDULE
    • 2023 SCHEDULE
    • 2022 SCHEDULE
    • 2021 SCHEDULE
    • 2020 SCHEDULE
    • 2019 SCHEDULE
    • 2018 SCHEDULE
    • 2017 SCHEDULE
    • 2016 SCHEDULE
  • BLEED GREEN!
    • WELCOME HOME
    • STUFF EVERY EAGLES FAN SHOULD KNOW
    • CHAMPIONSHIPS
    • STUFF I SAY A LOT
  • SCOUTING
    • OFFENSIVE PLAYERS
    • DEFENSIVE PLAYERS
  • PHOTOS
    • MEMORY LANE
    • RIVALS
    • FOR A LAUGH
    • BITCHES
    • PLAYER CARDS

WHAT TO EXPECT FROM BLOUNT

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/05/18
Posted in: Conversations, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Offense, Players, Roster. Tagged: Eagles, expect, LeGarrette Blount, Philadelphia, Ryan Mathews, Wendell Smallwood. 1 Comment

Blount Instrument.jpg

SIGNING RB LeGarrette Blount to replace RB Ryan Mathews, will save the Eagles about 4M dollars in cap space this year. It also fills gives us a short yardage and goalline runner who can indeed move a pile. I look forward to using phrases like “Blount Force Trauma”, “beaten with a Blount instrument”, and “Don’t Punt It. Blount It!” I also look forward to the backfield nickname of “Blount and Runt”.

But before we get carried away, fingering each other in celebration, it’s important that we pump the brakes and look at what we really have. There’s been a tendency to look at this signing through one lens, and that only sets us up for disappointment. We know we have a guy with long history of being a pile mover, but we also need to discuss his drawbacks.

One of his chief drawbacks is that he has a long history of being a pile mover. Pile movers (aka powerbacks) have a tendency to go over a cliff suddenly in the NFL. Christian Okoye, Barry Word, Rod Bernstine, Leonard Russell, Bam Morris, Barry Foster, Natrone Means, Mike Alstott, Brandon Jacobs. All of these guys made noise as NFL powerbacks. Not one of them was still nearly as effective at the age of 30. In fact, most were out of football by 30. Did I mention that Blount is 30? Oh, I didn’t? Let me correct that.

LeGarrette Blount is 30.

Blount is not an every down RB. I know people want to point to 2016 like it’s the standard for what he delivers, but the rest of his career strongly indicates that 2016 was a fluke. He hasn’t started more than 8 games in any season since 2011. He also has a career total of 46 receptions over 7 seasons. Basically, every time we trot him out there, we’re telling our opponent that the play is a run. Since he’s 250 pounds, he’s probably not running many Stretch plays, so we’re also saying “He’s coming at you between the tackles!”

He’s also not exactly a home-run hitter. Yes he had 18 rushing TD’s last year, but 13 were from inside the five, and NINE of those were from the one yard line or shorter.

What we have here is a role-player. Odds are, Wendell Smallwood is the “starter” in what will likely be a RB-by-committee approach, that doesn’t allow anyone to get into a rhythm and telegraphs our intentions (Blount = run, Darren Sproles = Screen, etc. etc.).

Blount should have enough juice to contribute if we use him at a pace of about 6 or 7 carries per game (96 to 112 over 16 games). However to expect more than a role player who nets 400 or so rushing yards, is unrealistic. Sorry, but I just felt someone had to speak Blountly about this.

KEEPING RYAN MATHEWS

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/05/17
Posted in: Coaching, Draft, Front Office (F.O.), Offense, Players, Rants, Roster. Tagged: Carson Wentz, Corey Clement, Darren Sproles, Eagles, Offense, Philadelphia, Ryan Mathews. 4 Comments

ryan mathews vs browns

CAN we talk about our Running Back situation for a minute? I don’t know if you’ve taken a good look at it, but at the moment we have:

24  Ryan Mathews               6-0 / 220

30  Corey Clement               5-10 / 220

28  Wendell Smallwood       5-10 208

39  Byron Marshall              5-9 / 201

43  Darren Sproles               5-6 / 190

34  Donnel Pumphrey          5-8 / 176

That’s six RB’s, with a (supposed) cut looming for Mathews. That would leave us with five RB’s, which is what we went with last year (Mathews, Marshall, Sproles, Smallwood, and Kenjon Barner). The make-up of this group however, is what has me concerned.

I forecast a lot of passing on third and short, and in goal line situations with this group; because when Mathews leaves, we don’t have a guy who can win man vs man “in the phone booth”. Mathews breaks tackles, but we’ve seen that Smallwood, Sproles, and Marshall are susceptible to arm tackles. Pumphrey looks to also fall into that category. Unless Clement shows us he can be “that guy” at this level, we don’t have a RB who can move the pile (or even one LB) to win short yardage situations.

The fact is, if our division rivals had our RB situation (after cutting Mathews), we’d be laughing about it. Sproles is scary in bursts, but he’s by no means 250 carry per year RB. In fact, last year’s 94 carries was his career high. Yes, I said career. And you saw how it wore him down. Our RB’s are only scary to RB coach Duce Staley‘s sense of job security. Or perhaps an undrafted, free agent rookie (Clement) can shock the world and save us! Barring that, we have no credibility at the position. That means opponents get to key on shutting down our passing game, with little fear of our sporadic run game hurting them.

(TRIVIA: Can you name which 7-9 team was 11th in the NFL in rushing yards in 2016? It was us.)

We passed on grabbing a bell-cow RB (like Latavius Murray, or Eddie Lacy) in the first round of Free Agency. We passed on picking up a bell-cow in any of the first three rounds of this NFL Draft. At this point, I’m not hopeful that a decent RB will hit another team’s cutting room floor in the second round of Free Agency on June 1st . Odds are that we won’t get LeGarrette Blount (whom I really don’t want), or Christine Michael (whom I’d be willing to gamble on if he got in before OTA’s start Tuesday).

Hate to say this to you fellow fans, but the Eagles absolutely shit the bed on this one. Just a messy wet one that they slept through, and rolled around in for a few hours. The result will likely be more 3rd and short passes than you’d see from a good team. When opponents get wise to this, you’re going to see them jumping QB Carson Wentz‘s short passes more and more. I hope his touchdown number goes up from last year’s 16, because without a legit RB he will almost certainly throw more picks than he did last year (14).

This has me hoping that the Eagles reconsider and keep Mathews on the roster. (Yes, it’s come to that.) I’m not the biggest fan of Mathews, but lucky for us he’s not out the door yet. We can take another crack at replacing him in 2018, but for now we should just miss out on the cap savings we could have gotten from cutting him, and try to save our QB’s ass for at least 16 more games.

WHAT DREW PEARSON HERE?

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/05/05
Posted in: Conversations, Draft, Rants, Rivals, Uncategorized. Tagged: 2017, Brian Dawkins, draft, Eagles, Eagles fans, Philadelphia. 3 Comments

no 88.jpg

AS a member of few NFC East based Trash Talk groups (on Facebook), I’ve ended up in dozens of debates over the years with Cowboys fans. The funny thing is, regardless of what subject they bring up (five rings, the Triplets, America’s Team), the one thing I never hear from them, is the name Drew Pearson. He simply never comes up. It’s almost as if they’d forgotten he’d existed.

brian_dawkins_smoke.jpg

When people love and want to remember athletes, they retire their numbers. A great example of that is Brian Dawkins. Dawk is loved by Eagles fans, so his number is NOT up for recycling on players who slap their mothers.  

Which is why Pearson went all-out to antagonize Eagles fans during the Draft. It was just a case of a forgotten relic, doing what he could to be relevant again for a week or so. It’s why a week later he continues to troll not the Eagles organization that he played against, but the Eagles fans themselves. He just wants to remind Cowboys fans that Dez Bryant, and Michael Irvin weren’t the only 88’s in team history.

My guess is that he still does appearances in Dallas, at bank openings and car dealerships. Mostly for those fans who haven’t quite reached senility yet, and so will still vaguely recall him, if they’re told who he is. Still, it apparently isn’t enough attention for the Wide Re-geezer. So to get his name out there, he hauled his shriveled keister onto an Econo/Coach flight (likely on his own dime, right Jerry?), and came to Philadelphia to be made emotionally whole, by the only fans on Earth who could do it.

You could see on his face that it felt good to him that anybody still felt anything at all for him. Even if all it was, was a distant and faded form of hatred. A watered down version of true hostility, delivered by an audience mostly too young to have ever seen him play. The hostility wasn’t really even for him, but for the Cowboys having been mentioned. How could it be for him, when no one knew who he was? In all truth, most Eagles fans would probably hold the door for him at Wawa, because we wouldn’t recognize him if our lives depended on it.

Still, it was nice of us to make an old man feel like he mattered, during what may be his last night under the bright lights. If only for a moment Eagles fans did what no Cowboys fans ever could. We made him feel like a Star again.

You’re welcomed Drew. Drive safe. 

2017 DRAFT REPORT

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/05/04
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, Draft, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Offense, Players, Reviews, Roster. Tagged: 2017, Derek Barnett, Donnel Pumphrey, draft, Eagles, Howie Roseman, Philadelphia, Sidney Jones. 6 Comments

GETTING it right. That’s always the most important part. I could have put out a Draft Report on Sunday, but I wanted to make sure I got it right. So I took my time, and I went over every pick again. Repeatedly.

Often times, people base Draft grades on whether or not an NFL team got good college players, instead of if those players stand a chance of helping the team that drafted them. After all, addressing weakness really is the point, right?

Weaknesses. We headed into the Draft needing a starting Cornerback to help our pass rush, or a bell-cow Running Back to loosen things up for QB Carson Wentz. We could have also used an Outside Linebacker who isn’t a liability in coverage, even against Running Backs. Yet we got none of those things.

So what DID we get?

1st round/ DE – Derek Barnett.

DE Derek Barnett Vs Alabama(2016)

DE Derek Barnett Vs Alabama(2016)

Barnett sets the edge and generally doesn’t end up on the ground vs the run. That’s basically what you want from a DE, but he wasn’t brought here to just play DE, he’s here to be a dominant pass rusher. However, when I look at this game vs Alabama, I don’t see a quick get-off. I don’t see great change of direction. I don’t see him using an array of moves to win early against offensive linemen. Name one great pass rusher in the NFL who lacks all of those tools. You can’t, because there aren’t any.

I’ve read that his hands keep him from being blocked long, but I couldn’t find any game tape (games, not highlight reels) that show him doing it consistently. So far I see a guy who will have an NFL career, but I don’t see 10-12 sacks per year from him at this level. If he proves me wrong, AT THIS LEVEL, great. But until then… Grade: C

2nd round/ CB – Sidney Jones.

CB Sidney Jones vs Usc (2016)

CB Sidney Jones vs Usc (2016)

We needed a CB immediately. Taking one this high was the right move to make. Totally made sense. What would have made more sense, would have been selecting a player who isn’t already sidelined for 2017. Word around the Training Room is that next year, after he rehabs his torn ACL (CORRECTION: An alert reader (thank you Bobby) pointed out that it’s Jone’s Achilles, not ACL that tore. My apologies for the error), Jones will be as good as he ever was. Might even be a steal. That’s the talk.

On tape here, you see a CB who even from a cushion will begin to concede a lot of real estate before the snap. College will allow DB’s that flaw, but in the NFL it’ll quickly earn you a target on your back. Also his man-press doesn’t seem to lead to significant redirection of his assignment. Luckily, these are things which can be corrected with coaching. Provided (as hoped) that he didn’t leave any of his athleticism in the operating room. Grade: C

3rd round/ CB – Rasul Douglas.

CB Rasul Douglas vs Oklahoma State 2016

CB Rasul Douglas vs Oklahoma State 2016

Douglas has good size at 6’2, but his near 4.6 speed causes me to question if he can play on the outside at this level. Also on tape you see he can be beaten badly on quick routes inside. That’s alarming because for a 209 pound CB, his press at the line is lacking. (There were two videos I could have chosen to show, but the other one was played in snow. That’s not a fair condition to assess players.)

The plan may be to move him to Free Safety as an insurance policy behind Rod McLeod. However, right now it seems like the Eagles spent an early pick on a guy without a true role. Grade: C

4th round/ WR – Mack Hollins.

WR Mack Hollins vs FSU 2016

WR Mack Hollins vs FSU 2016

I flat out hate this pick. The Eagles went out and drafted a Special Teams coverage player, in the fourth round. Drafted him! Smart teams wait until after the Draft to get those guys. On top of that, as a WR he shuffles his feet at the snap and doesn’t attack his blocking assignments. Grade: F

4th round/ RB – Donnel Pumphrey.

RB Donnel Pumphrey vs Houston 2016

RB Donnel Pumphrey vs Houston 2016

We supposedly got him to replace Darren Sproles at some point. Then again we were sold the same bill of goods last year, regarding Byron Marshall, remember? To his credit, Pumphrey catches the ball pretty well, and is very nimble. If he can get the ball in open space, he can be an asset. Then again that statement likely would be true for most RB’s. Grade: C

5th round/ WR – Shelton Gibson.

WR Shelton Gibson (West Virginia) vs Youngstown St 2016

WR Shelton Gibson (West Virginia) vs Youngstown St 2016

I like this WR far more than the first one we selected. Although Gibson is also a drafted Special Teamer coverage guy, aspects of his game that say he may actually be able to contribute as a WR. He doesn’t hesitate at the snap and he aggressively gets into his blocks. (Which could help Pumphrey.) I think you add ST coverage guys after a Draft, but if Gibson can contribute as a WR and help return kicks, then this was a really nice place to take him. Grade: B

5th round/ SS – Nathan Gerry.

SS Nathan Gerry Nebraska vs Oregon 2016

SS Nathan Gerry Nebraska vs Oregon 2016

This is another horrible pick. Too often he slows down to a jog before the play is even dead. He misses tackles. (Did you see that last part where the QB ran him over?) He can be seen being “extra” after plays, instead of being adequate during them. Grade: F

6th round/ DT – Elijah Qualls.

DT Elijah Qualls vs Oregon St.

DT Elijah Qualls vs Oregon St.

No penetration. No ability to win one-on-one. Ends up on the ground in a number of ways. Maybe if we tape a cheeseburger to the QB or cover him in BBQ sauce, Qualls might not end up being redirected so easily. I have no idea how this guy got drafted by anyone. I doubt he even makes the practice squad. Grade: F

+ + + + + +

Last year we finished in the middle of the league with 34 sacks, which was 14 sacks behind the leader who had 48. DE Brandon Graham led the NFL with 40 hurries, more of which could have been sacks if we had CB’s who could cover last year. The problem wasn’t our Defensive Line’s ability to get to the QB, it was that they weren’t given the time to do so. So of course we went out and got a starting CB, right? Wrong. We got a DE.

Our CB play was so bad last year, that we got rid of both Starters. While Sidney Jones may or may not become a perennial All-Pro after 2018, that still leaves us with questions about CB in 2017.

We needed to upgrade at WR, so we added two Free Agents, after Howie Roseman said no more “band-aids”.  Then we waited until the 4th and 5th rounds to draft Special Teamers. 

We needed a bell-cow RB and instead we drafted a player to someday replace a situational player.

Considering that we ended 2016 with a few needs (OLB, OT, RB) that we didn’t address during Free Agency, it’s hard to call this a good Draft, when we continued to ignore those needs.

The question isn’t about whether or not we drafted guys who can play. That really isn’t the question. It really isn’t the issue. The real issue is whether or not we fixed the holes that teams exploited against us in 9 losses out of 16 games last year. The answer is that we didn’t fix those holes. We didn’t utilize this Draft properly. So the truth is, while this was an amazing Draft for Philadelphia, it was a wasted Draft for the Eagles. The Front Office didn’t get it right.

So where do I apply to run the Eagles 2018 Draft?

LET’S TALK WIDE RECEIVERS

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/29
Posted in: Conversations, Draft, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Offense, Players, Rants, Roster, Special Teams. Tagged: 2017, draft, Eagles, Jordan Matthews, Nelson Agholor, Philadelphia, Torrey Smith, WR. Leave a comment

article regular-NFL Draft.640px.espn

HELP me understand this. In 2016 we had trouble at WR, so we didn’t cut any of our primary WR’s in Jordan Matthews, Nelson Agholor, or Dorial Green-Beckham. Instead we ADDED Free Agents Alshon Jeffrey and Torrey Smith. Surely we weren’t going keep all five of these guys heading into September, so we’d need to shave at least Agholor. So why then are we drafting more WR’s? 

I could see drafting a WR if we were talking about Chris Godwin, whom QB Carson Wentz could mature with. I could see the logic if we were talking about JuJu Smith-Schuster or if we’d traded up to get a top-shelf guy. What I don’t get, is burning picks on WR’s who seem more like they were drafted with an eye towards them playing Special Teams here. You get those guys after the Draft.

We came into this Draft loaded with NFL quality veterans at the WR position. We had real depth in case of injury, for a team that generally keeps 5 active WR’s. So are we keeping 6 this year, or are we going to get rid of real depth to hold onto a Special Teamer or two? That’s not a question fans ask on Draft day, but come September ‘Cut Downs’, that very conversation will happen among Eagles coaches.

Remember how we kept Bryce Treggs over Paul Turner last year? Neither was drafted, but we deactivated a quality receiver for a fast guy who played Special Teams. Don’t look now, but I think we just set that same scenario up, when we drafted WR Mack Hollis in the 4th and Shelton Gibson in the 5th. In that scenario, who do you cut? Do you keep the quality vets, or do we cut one of our draft picks?

It’s easy to say if we keep five, “Cut Agholor since he’s a bust anyway”. That would mean cutting a vet and at least one of the WR’s we drafted. Given that the WR’s we drafted were 4th and 5th rounders, most fans won’t care if they get cut anyway. The odds are already stacked against 4th and 5th rounders to even make the team. Why bellyache over it, right?

Here is where I need you to explain this to me. If the odds are already long for a 4th and 5th rounder, why draft two guys at a spot where you already have plenty of help? You just stacked a stacked deck even more against either of these picks panning out. It’s basically giving away a draft pick. Or two! This is only made worse by the fact that we still need an OLB, or a RB to fill in for Ryan Mathews if, WHEN he gets hurt this year.

Maybe you can explain it to me. Please, when you do, use VERY small words. I don’t want to miss anything. Because the Eagles Draft already has me tilting my head like a dog.

WE DIDN’T ADMINISTER WITH BARNETT

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/28
Posted in: Conspiracy Corner, Conversations, Defense, Draft, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Players, Rants, Roster. Tagged: 2017, Derek Barnett, draft, Eagles, Fletcher Cox, minister, Philadelphia, Reggie White, Vinny Curry. 2 Comments

ReggieWhite n JB.jpg

OUR first pick in the 2017 Draft was DE Derek Barnett, and it was a stupid pick to make. I’m not saying that the young man won’t get sacks. He will get sacks. Even DE Marcus Smith has gotten us sacks. I’m not saying Barnett won’t be a decent pro. I’m saying that given our needs at other positions, and how financially leveraged we are along the Defensive Line, it made no sense to pile more money in an area that will only prevent us from spending on other positions where we badly need the help.

I won’t even harp on the whole thing were we passed on talent at other positions. That’s a real issue, but I’ll let that walk until at least after round three. (The Eagles may surprise us. Again.) When I say it was a bad pick, I mean it from a purely mathematical standpoint. 

Let’s look at some numbers!

1) Over the next two years we’re still on the hook to DE Vinny Curry for 20M out of a guaranteed 23M (7M base and 2M bonus in 2017 / 9M base and 2M bonus in 2018). After that, we’re free to release him and eat 6M in dead money for two years due to an amortization of his 10M signing bonus.

card.vinny.curry

2) Over the next three years DT Fletcher Cox is guaranteed 49.3M of 63.3M (3M base, 5.2M bonus, 1.2M option in 2017 / 11.5M base, 5.2M bonus, 1.2M option in 2018 / 15.6M base, 5.2M bonus, 1.2M option in 2019). After that we’re free to release him and eat 6.4M in dead money.

card.fletcher.cox

I know those numbers turn into a blur when you read them quick like that, but the point is that for these two players, out of about 167M in cap space, we already were on the hook for 18M in 2017, and 28.9M in 2018. Now to that same D-Line we just added a first round contract, which will fall somewhere in the area of 4years, 18M (DE DeForest Buckner #7 in 2016) and 4years, 10M (DE Shaq Lawson #19 in 2016).

We are loading money into one area, and it will keep us from being able to spread it around into other positions like OT, CB, and WR; none of which are ever cheap when you try to sign or re-sign quality players. This doesn’t even mention positions like LB, and RB which we badly need help at.

In the meantime, some fans are cheering this pick like it means the end of Curry. What those fans fail to understand is that Curry will impact this roster for at least the next two years. At least. That’s regardless of how things play out. Whether he starts the next 32 games, or is cut the moment you read these words, Curry will seriously impact the Eagles until at least 2019. The real question is would you like to try and recoup some value over these next two years, or would you rather see him cut (after never starting a single game) and just swallow it?

On the other hand, people talking like Barnett will be the next Reggie White because he broke White’s college sack record, crack me up. If they’re looking for Barnett to get us 13, 18, 21 and 18 sacks in his first four years, despite not being quick twitch, possessing an explosive step, or not being great at changing direction, boy are they gonna be disappointed. How many great NFL pass rushers are playing in the NFL today without at least one of those tools? How many? Oh yeah, that’s right. Not one.

This isn’t the case of a talent (Barnett) that was too good to pass up. There will be no takers in a trade for a guy (Curry) making 9M per year who has never started a game. This is an unforced error that will limit our options at other spots on the roster. We didn’t administer forethought to this pick. As a result, we’ve painted ourselves into a corner. (Ironically by not selecting one.)

WILL THE EAGLES BE BETTER?

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/24
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, Draft, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Offense. Tagged: 2017, Art Museum, draft, Eagles, improve, Philadelphia. 2 Comments

INSTEAD of keeping you in suspense, I’ll start by saying

FUCK YEAH.jpg

the Eagles will be better in 2017 than they were in 2016. When I say better, I’m not saying “They’ll show everyone that they’re on the right track.” I’m not saying “You’ll see that they’re poised to compete in 2018.” Nope, I’m not making any weak statements here.

I’m saying “Our record will be better than 7-9”. I’m saying “The Eagles will compete IN 2017.” I’m saying GET EXCITED DAMMIT!

We added some weapons for our young QB. We addressed depth issues on our Offensive and Defensive Lines, as well as in the Secondary. These were problem areas in 2016 and they were solidly addressed in a way that not only gave us players, but options in player style. We even added an insurance policy when we up-graded our back-up QB situation. So we are clearly a deeper team today. That part is beyond questioning.

What we haven’t addressed so far, is our lack of a top-shelf RB, or a second Starter at CB. Those positions headline the shopping list that the Eagles will be taking to the Art Museum-

West Door Art Museum 7.29.15.JPG

I’m proud to say I took this picture myself. This is the West Door of the Art Museum. Most people are familiar with the East Door or “The Rocky Steps”, but it’s this entrance that patrons primarily use when visiting the museum. The West Door also used to be my Dad’s security post when I was a kid. I practically lived here.

-on Thursday, when the 2017 Draft opens. Given how deep this draft is at both positions, we’re all but guaranteed to get a player we need, instead of just getting a placeholder that we hope will pan out.

My regular readers know that I’m not much of a cheerleader. That having been said, I’ve got my pom-poms in hand, and my pizzazz skirt on. If you truly want to see me in that outfit, CLICK HERE.

If you didn’t see me in a skirt, you can pity those who have, and be thankful you still have your eyesight. Better still, you can celebrate by watching our Eagles compete for the division crown this season.

I REALLY LIKE THIS SCHEDULE

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/20
Posted in: Conversations, Fans, NFL, Uncategorized. Tagged: 2017, Christmas, division, Eagles, football, NFC East, Oakland Raiders, Philadelphia, schedule. Leave a comment

(article)NEWS FLASH!!!

DEAR Schedule Makers, thank you for not fucking my team over this year. Also, thank you for not putting all the division games at the end of the year, which has a way of making half the season irrelevant. Folks, in case you can’t tell, I really like this schedule.

We have a Week 10 Bye, where 14 days elapse between games. That gives our guys some time to let bruises heal, small sorenesses to alleviate and legs to freshen. This is GOOOOOOD, folks. Fresh legs and then a “Get Hype!” game against a division opponent. Oh, and did I mention it’s a road game, which means the pressure to win is mostly on the home team.

My favorite games are Week 1 and Week 17.

Week 17 has my two favorite teams being served up to me on Christmas Day. I get Football for Christmas, and no matter who wins, I get to smile about it. If there are playoff implications, then I likely get to watch a hell of a game to boot. I have to love that.

Week 1 has us going against a Redskins team that has had our number for a few years now. Not winning that game would say that, we still need to prove we’re better than last season’s team. No big deal since well duh… it would just be Week 1. A win however, says that we’re already better than last season, or that the Redskins are already worse. Either way, it still would put us over them in the standings.

This is a good schedule! It’s a fun schedule! I like this one! Can I take it home, Pa? Can I? Yeah. In case you didn’t get the hint, I really like this schedule.

2017 NFC EAST PRE-DRAFT PREDICTION

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/14
Posted in: Conversations, Crazy Talk, Defense, NFL, Offense, Players, Preview, Rivals, Roster, Special Teams, Uncategorized. Tagged: 2017, Eagles, giants, new york, Philadelphia, prediction, Preview, redskins, Washington. 1 Comment

Keep in mind, when these predictions come out, no one knows who will be drafted, and by which team. This is an assessment of the teams as they are staffed by veteran players with track records. Rookies don’t usually shake up the NFC East division, so there’s a pretty good chance that what you see here, will be how it shakes out for the year.

division shield.jpg

Yikes! Last year showed a couple exceptions to the general rule cited in the above Preamble. The first example was the Dallas Cowboys. They powered their way to the top of the division behind the play of two rookies, one of which was a QB forced to make 16 starts, when the long-time incumbent pulled up lame. (Again.) The Philadelphia Eagles were the second exception. They thought so much of their rookie QB that they traded away their Starter, and let the rook do his thing all year long. While that may have cost them a game or two last year, it was clear to fans, media and Free Agents alike, that the Eagles may be onto something.

Now we separate the men from the boys:

Strongest Offense: DALLAS

While Dallas is returning all of their skill position Starters, they suffered a couple of hits to their offensive line. Those hits are simple enough to patch over, but where those hits will show up is in depth. Last season when La’el Collins went down, there was a player of Ron Leary‘s caliber to step in for him. This year they have no such luxury.

Will the Cowboys be who they were last year? No they won’t. Teams have film on them now, and the system they run is so simple, it shouldn’t take much to slow them down. That said, each of Dallas’s rivals have some issue that keeps their own offenses from being complete, let alone scary. The Cowboys are the only team in the division who are not suffering from a key deficiency.

Weakest Offense: WASHINGTON

I can tell you firsthand that the loss of WR DeSean Jackson changes the way teams play against your offense. It also takes away a number of easy underneath options that a QB comes to think of as their’s for the taking. Jackson was on the roster when Kirk Cousins became the Starter, so he is coming into a completely new reality in 2017. (Assuming that his mind is on 2017, and not on preserving his body for a long-term contract in San Francisco next year.) Washington’s one-dimensional run game won’t be of much help either, since most of it is derived from what the offensive line creates, instead of what the RB creates when the line gives him an opening.

While they have a good offensive line and a TE situation worthy of envy, they don’t have the glue to hold it all together. Their losses on defense will require them to throw more, and may yield more yards and touchdowns, but if you look under the surface at the end of 2017, you will see a clearly less effective and diminished offense on this team.

Strongest Defense: PHILADELPHIA

Dallas’s junior GM, Stephen Jones is on record agreeing that his team is worse off since Free Agency. Washington was already in the toilet before they lost DE Chris Baker. New York losing DT Johnathan Hankins and not being settled at MLB, puts a hole right down the center of their run defense (ranked #3 in 2016). Also, nothing so far has been done to bolster their 23rd ranked pass defense. Philadelphia on the other hand has added depth up front, but still hasn’t clearly addressed their Secondary concerns. However, their 2016 pass defense was ranked 13th not 23rd. (Note: There isn’t a team in this division that doesn’t have issues with it’s Secondary)

This isn’t a question of the strongest of the weak. There is no doubt about the Eagles strength at every level of their defense. Particularly on the Defensive Line. Better still, they have depth in most places. Last year the Eagles weakness was at CB, and so both starters are no longer on the roster. Patrick Robinson was to added to play slot CB, not as an outside starter. The remaining CB’s aren’t household names, but given the way Jalen Mills played in 2016 (his rookie season), he might become one soon.

Weakest Defense: DALLAS

They literally have problems at every level of their defense, and in every facet of it. Talent, depth, experience, and even health coming into OTA’s. Everything is wrong here. This defense is going to allow too many games to turn into shootouts, and force their offense away from the run just to keep up. Barring every other team in NFC East suffering a rash of injuries, this team has no shot at 12-4 again. The GM responsible for creating this mess should be fi– oh wait… Never mind.

Strongest Special Teams: PHILADELPHIA

This isn’t even close. Kicking, Punting, Returns and limiting return yards, The Eagles are the only team in the division that is good in all of these areas. Not just okay, or passable. Legitimately good. They are proficient across the board, where the other three teams have at least one deficiency.

Weakest Special Teams: NEW YORK

Playing musical Kickers as you habitually post lackluster numbers, while also making no attempt to improve neither your personnel nor your coaching staff… That says in plain language that the organization doesn’t give a damn about this facet of the game.

 

Projected Winner: PHILADELPHIA (10-6)

After being 0-2 these last 2 years picking the Eagles, it scares the hell out me to be picking them again after a second 7-9 season. I kept going over this to make sure I wasn’t overlooking something, or missing something, because I have no interest in wearing 0-3. However, the fact is, right now, before the Draft, as these teams are staffed today, the Eagles are the team best equipped to survive the 17 week meat grinder known as an NFL season.

The Eagles are the only team in the NFC East that didn’t get worse in some regard, during this offseason. While it has yet to be proven that they fixed their 2016 offensive problems, those problems weren’t ignored (like the giants pass defense for example). The Eagles attempted to fix their problems, and so they run the risk of actually improving in 2017.

The same cannot be said for the defenses of the Cowboys, Redskins and giants. Dallas’s defense is so bad that their Front Office is already making excuses. Now that they have definitely lost Hankins at DT, New York’s run defense (ranked 3rd) is likely to fall steeply. Their pass defense was already an issue in 2016, and so far, they‘ve done nothing to fix or even upgrade it. Washington’s defense was already crap in 2016, and now they have offense to match it. In fact, their offense (both in the long and short term), have football pundits shaking their heads from coast to coast.

team

Look Out For: DALLAS

I don’t think they stand a chance in Hell, of upsetting the Eagles, but it would h ave been tacky to write “NOBODY” as the team to look out for. Since the Pokes won the division last, I figured they were owed the respect of a write-in.

2017 – PHILADELPHIA EAGLES

Posted by The BEAST on 2017/04/13
Posted in: Defense, Offense, Players, Preview, Rivals, Roster. Tagged: 2017, Carson Wentz, Eagles, Fletcher Cox, Jordan Hicks, Malcolm Jenkins, Philadelphia, pre-draft, Preview, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment

the big bird.png

LAST year…the Eagles went 2-4 in the division, and 7-9 overall. The team started out a very hot 3-0, and then went a very tepid 4-9 for the remainder of the season. After a second consecutive 7-9 season, the Birds found themselves in sole possession of the division’s basement.

That was last year. The following is a report on the team looks today, prior to the NFL Draft….

OFFENSE

QB:
Carson Wentz turned in a statistically “meh” season, throwing 16 touchdowns against 14 interceptions. He did a number of little things (mostly pre-snap) that many rookies don’t usually do. That however won’t mean squat in 2017, because he won’t be a rookie anymore, and no one will be judging him on that sliding scale anymore. (Thank God!)

First the bad news. You’d like to see a rookie’s performances tighten up towards the end of the season, but Wentz’s games were still all over the map. The inconsistency of his performances indicate a QB who is allowing how he plays to be dictated to him by his opposition. Again, that is the bad news.

Now the good news. Dallas games 1&2, NYG games 1&2, Washington games 1&2. In every one of those match-ups Wentz was better in the second meeting. This indicates that he consistently learns from experience, and assimilates what he learns. While his game performances did fluctuate, so did the cast around him, almost weekly. Smooth sailing never made a good sailor, and Wentz started out with some pretty rough chop under him. Regardless, he was still unflappable for the duration. You cannot teach that trait. (Right, Jay Cutler?)

Behind Wentz is returning Eagle Nick Foles. Foles represents a massive upgrade over last year’s #2, Chase Daniel. Many fans unreasonably soured on Foles in 2014, after he came back to Earth after his miracle 2013 season that (I warned) he could never duplicate, after teams figured out the gimmicky system the Eagles ran back then. Foles is now back, and in a more traditional system that actually fits him. He’s not a star, but he’s a legitimate NFL QB who can handle the Philadelphia media, as well as win games (20-16 (.555) as a starter, 16-9 (.640) when not with the Rams). So even if Wentz were to go down, the Eagles season would still have some life in it. (+)

RB:
Ryan Mathews is still on the roster today, but that won’t be the case for long. Darren Sproles is a nifty weapon to have, and is a match-up nightmare. The problem is, that his 33 year old, 190 pound body has 12 years of NFL wear and tear on it. He cannot be the bell-cow. Wendell Smallwood was amazingly unremarkable as a RB in his rookie year, turning not one carry, nor catch (in 83 touches) into a 20 yard gain. Terrell Watson was picked up off the street for the last game of the year, and showed enough tough inside running to warrant a long look in OTA’s. The Eagles lack a threat in the backfield that teams can consistently take seriously, let alone fear. Until that changes, the entire Offense will rest on the shoulders of the QB. (-)

WR:
Answer: Santa Claus, Superman, and Nelson Agholor. Question: What are three things you’ve learned to not believe in? (Pause for applause.) Dorial Green-Beckham is a tease as a big target with good speed. Whether he can put those pieces together remains to be seen at this point. As for the rest of the receivers, Jordan Matthews is legit and proven, as are new Eagles Alshon Jeffery and Torrey Smith.

On paper it’s not a scary group, at first. Then you realize that unlike last year, this is a stable of decent-to-good, proven veterans who as a group, constitute a consistent red zone match-up nightmare. Matthews is a 6’3” slot receiver, Jeffery is 6’3”, and Green-Beckham is 6’5”. Smith is a weapon to be deployed between the 20’s, due to his ability to stretch the field. It’s an easy group to overlook. Hell, I almost did it myself. It isn’t at all scary at first glance, but bundled together like this, you can count on this group to cost a lot of defensive coordinators, an awful lot of sleep this year. (+)

superman santa

TE:
For yet another year the Eagles are three deep at this position. Zach Ertz is a very good receiver, but his “improving” work as a run blocker is why the team grossly overpays Brent Celek. Celek still can and will catch the ball (when he gets a chance at it), but he’s mainly used as a blocker in the run game now. Posting 37 catches for 327 yards, most teams would be lucky to have Trey Burton as a back-up TE. Some (ATL, JAX, DEN, MIA, NYG) could have used him as a Starter, but Philadelphia has the luxury of him as their third. This position lacks a classic Jason Witten type (then again so do most teams), but unlike most teams, the Eagles have varied depth that provides them the ability to create mismatches or match-up deficiencies. Rare birds here. (+)

OL:
Jason Peters and Lane Johnson are solid at OT, but people seem to be staring at their watches, waiting for Peters to begin falling apart. Depth at OT comes in the form of disappointing Halapoulivaati Vaitai, and swing-men Matt Tobin and Allen Barbre. (Both of whom are better at G than at T.) Former DT/DE Taylor Hart is getting a look at OT. If the Eagles can find themselves an Alejandro Villanueva type, (that they don’t let get away this time), they will look like geniuses. If it doesn’t work, who cares? The guy was DT. At G they have Brandon Brooks, Stefen Wisniewski, and new Eagle Chance Warmack. Issac Seumalo could also be depth at G, provided the Eagles don’t use him to replace C Jason Kelce (as per some rumors). This is a position with a few really good players, but Offensive Line is never about how good each man is. O-Line is about how well those men play together. Until we see who the Eagles put out there together, it’s impossible to say this group has it’s act together yet. Until they prove it… (-)

In a nutshell:

With the exception of a RB, this unit has all the individual pieces, it’s just a matter of whether or not the team can put them together. “Is it soup yet?” is the question. The Offense has the potential to be far more than the sum of it’s parts, but so far without a proven track record from the QB, no real threat at RB, and an Offensive Line that still needs to be defined, there is no way to assume they will get everything ironed out. There is a difference between giving someone the benefit of the doubt, and being flat out biased. Assuming this Offense will “just click” would be flat out bias. If this unit can put the parts together it will not be a surprise. In fact it’s to be expected. But they haven’t done it yet, so…(-)

DEFENSE

DE:
Between Brandon Graham and new Eagle Chris Long, the team has a pair of relentless pass rushers who also play decent vs the run. What the Eagles don’t have, is anyone that will keep opposing coaches awake at night. Contract constraints will likely to force the Eagles to set politics aside this year, and finally start Vinny Curry (likely over Long). The rotational method employed by Defensive Coordinator Jim Schwartz keeps players healthier, fresher, and maximizes their abilities. It ensures consistent pressure regardless of who is out there. It even managed to wring good play from a Draft bust who’d been reduced to a situational rusher, in Marcus Smith. Smith not only started reaching QB’s, but he was bringing consistent pressure whenever his feet hit the field. He was a direct beneficiary of no longer playing in a bullshit system. That said, pressure isn’t sacks. The Eagles need sacks. They need sack-fumbles. This position has no star, but it’s stacked with guys who have blue-collar mindsets and good work ethics. While it could stand to be scarier, from top to bottom this position is undeniably solid, with little fall-off between the Starting Wave and the Second Wave. Likely no other team can boast that, and if they draft a stud… (+)

DT/NT:
Fletcher Cox is just about as good as it gets in the NFL at this position. While the team lost Bennie Logan to Free Agency, and Beau Allen for (at least) half the season to a pectoral injury, they did pick up Timmy Jernigan in a suh-WEET trade with the Ravens. There is no fall-off in starting quality here. In fact, you could argue that the the Eagles Starting interior is more dangerous in 2017, than it was year ago. I said Starting interior. Depth is not as clear cut.

With Allen sidelined, the Eagles will miss his (and Logan’s) run-plugging. Destiny Vaeao acquitted himself nicely as a rookie, but he, Cox, and Jernigan are more gap penetrators than gap pluggers. None of these players have trouble playing the run, so the Eagles are good here. There are a couple more guys, but they aren’t proven. For depth purposes the Eagles may want to invest in a low budget, wide bodied, late round/post-Draft Free Agent, to eat space. (+)

OLB:
Nigel Bradham led the team with 102 tackles, grabbed a couple sacks, and made his presence felt in pass coverage. A full service SAM (I told you) who started 16 games is nice to have. Mychal Kendricks in the WILL spot…is less to cheer about. He only started 8 games out of the 15 he played, but those starts were throughout the year, and at no point was he ever actually demoted. More important than number of starts was how ineffective he was during the year. There was no hint of an ability to make big plays, and he was a clear liability in pass coverage. Worse still is the fact that there isn’t really anyone to demote Kendricks in favor of. The reserves seem to be signed with an eye more towards Special Teams than regular downs. (-)

M/ILB:
Jordan “Cowboy Killer” Hicks led the team (yes the team) in interceptions with 5 last year. While his 85 tackles look a little lean for a MIKE, his 11 pass break-ups has to scare the hell out of teams. The idea of a MLB collecting 7 picks in 21 career starts is nothing to take lightly. Last year Stephen Tulloch was signed as a back-up on a 1 year deal, 3 days after Joe Walker tore his ACL. Instead of signing Tulloch for another year, the Eagles felt good enough to ride with returning Walker as Hick’s solo understudy for now. This isn’t a flashy position as you don’t hear Hick’s name mentioned much. It’s more like a snake hiding in the grass. Teams often don’t see the danger until it’s too late. (+)

jordan-hicks-picks-cowboys-2.jpg

S:
This is a great group. Malcolm Jenkins and Rodney McLeod are an excellent duo. Notching 3 interceptions apiece in their first year together (while both were learning a new scheme), portends great things for the future. Much of the damage they did was early in the season, before the Corners were exposed and traffic in the middle was abandoned for easier pickings on the outsides. Jaylen Watkins is the primary back-up with the ability to also play the Nickle, though he lacks the speed to line up on the outside. This group lacks a thumper, but they do everything well, and are technically as sound as a dollar. (+)

CB:
This position is a total reconstruct. Of last years Starters, Nolan Carroll was allowed to walk via Free Agency and Leodis McKelvin was shown THE DOOR. Neither will be missed. At all. In their place is a gaggle of guys looking for a chance to prove they were overlooked before. Rookie Jalen Mills was feisty in coverage, but also a little to grabby. If the team names him a Starter, don’t be surprised by the move. Ron Brooks was part of the Eagles 4-2 start, but then finished the season on Injured Reserve for the third time in his five year career. Dwayne Gratz was on 3 rosters (JAX, LAR, PHI) in 2016, playing only in 6 games with no starts. The Eagles brought in Patrick Robinson via Free Agency. Robinson is a well traveled underachiever, but former Saint teammate Malcolm Jenkins help convince him to sign here. Aaron Grymes had no business being cut in 2016. Favoritism for being a former Jim Schwartz player, was clearly a factor against him last year. Hopefully this year that mistake won’t be made again. All that being said, on paper this is a VERY weak position. If the Eagles can draft Jesus at CB, they’d better do so. (-)

In a nutshell:

This team could have been better in 2016, but politics (like starting Connor Barwin over Vinny Curry, and blatant favoritism towards players who’s played in Jim Schwartz’s scheme before), figured into lesser performances by the players who benefited, and got to start when they clearly shouldn’t have. If the Eagles put such nonsense behind them, they can be in 2017 what they should have been in 2016.

Last year this team looked like a nightmare waiting to happen, and they were that exactly, until leaky CB play undercut the Defense as a whole. Even with that problem, the Eagles finished 13th vs the pass and 12th in points allowed. The Defense was for real. This year with most of those players returning, or having been upgraded from, they look every bit as imposing again. The caveat is that the CB position is now a known Achilles Heel. Teams will come out targeting it until the Eagles can prove it’s no longer a problem. However, if this team can get even decent CB play this year, bullshit and shenanigans will have to happen for the Eagles to miss the postseason. (+)

SPECIAL TEAMS

P:
Last season Donnie Jones only launched 63 punts over the course of 16 games. That number was 23 fewer than the season before, and also the lowest since Jones became a regular (Starter?) in 2005. This isn’t to say that he was ineffective. In fact, for a second year in a row his average was over 45 yards (45.8) and his net was still over 40 (40.7). He put up a long punt of 72 yards, and only surrendered 202 return yards (12.6 per game) and one touchdown, on just 25 returns (39.6% return rate). Jones was a monster last year. (+)

K:
Caleb Sturgis is coming off of the best Field Goal kicking year of his career so far. Career long of 55. Career attempts of 41. Career makes of 35. Career accuracy of 85.4%. Oh and the average kickoff return allowed was just 18.7 yards. This all sounds great until you realize that from 39 yards and in, he was 24/24 with an accuracy mark of 100%, but beyond 40 yards, he fell to 11/17 (64.7%). That’s a hell of a tumble. He had a 40 yarder blocked, but his remaining misses are 44, 46, 49, 51, and 55. All were outdoors, and 5/6 misses came in November or later. Those are playoff game and playoff game qualifying, kinds of kicks. This is to say that Sturgis serviceable, but he doesn’t seem to have “clutch” in him. I have to grade him based on what he has done, not on the failures he has yet to suffer. Eagles fans just better hope that the season doesn’t come down to his foot. (+)

RS:
The Eagles were (no doubt) more dangerous with WR Josh Huff returning kicks last year as he posted 252 yards on 7 returns (36.0), with a 98 yard score. Sadly, he did something stupid and had to be released into the wild, to roam free with other idiots (aka Tampa Bay). This left the Eagles stuck with only Kenjon Barner (9/277/30.8) and Wendell Smallwood (9/261/29.0/1TD) on Kickoff Returns and Darren Sproles (17/224/13.2/1TD) on Punt Returns. Boo hoo, right? All three of those players return in 2017, but you can bet the Eagles will still be on the prowl for more help there. (+)

In a nutshell:

While other teams are scrambling to find and/or keep a good returner, the Eagles have a stable of them. While the Kicker is technically sound, there is an obvious hole in his game. Unfortunately there isn’t even a camp leg on the roster to push him, so it’ll be what it’ll be. The Eagles owe so much to their punting and punt coverage. It has a clockwork way of setting the Defense up to be successful. This is hands down the best Special Teams unit in the division, and it’s not even remotely close. (+)

Bottom Line:

Like last year, expect this team to be carried by the Defense, as the Offense tries to catch up. That said, this team is so close in so many regards. Much of it is easy to overlook because as football fans we’ve been trained to look for that one standout guy. We star hunt. What this team is (even before the Draft) is cleverly assembled so that the pieces complement each other, and the whole team then becomes much more than the mere sum of it’s parts. There are still a couple of missing pieces, but when this team does click, they won’t be merely good, they will be dominant. Seemingly overnight.

 

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • THE 2026 A.J. BROWN TRADE
    • TRADE NOLAN SMITH
    • FOUR THINGS REVIEWED: WILDCARD : 49ers
    • FOUR THINGS: WILDCARD: EAGLES – 49ers
    • FOUR THINGS REVIEWED: WK 18: Commanders
  • Follow EAGLEMANIACAL.com on WordPress.com
  • 2023 SEASON

  • Recent Comments

    FOUR THINGS REVIEWED… on FOUR THINGS: WILDCARD: EAGLES…
    FOUR THINGS REVIEWED… on FOUR THINGS: WK 18: EAGLES –…
    FOUR THINGS REVIEWED… on FOUR THINGS: WK 17: EAGLES –…
    FOUR THINGS REVIEWED… on FOUR THINGS: WK 16: EAGLES –…
    FOUR THINGS REVIEWED… on FOUR THINGS: WK 15: EAGLES –…
  • Archives

  • Log in
Blog at WordPress.com.
EAGLEMANIACAL.com
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • EAGLEMANIACAL.com
    • Join 110 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • EAGLEMANIACAL.com
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...